How do Liberals reconcile their hypocritical opposition to war over oil?
April 8, 2010 by
Filed under sheep supplies
and their support for National health care. Since 90% of medical equipment and supplies are made from petroleum products I guess if doctors are forced to use wood, stone and sheep skins that will save a lot of money.
Melissa me. I never said the war was or wasn’t for oil, but if it is was it would be justified.
why cant you liberals answer a question without swisting it around to make it about Conservatives?
Mel, you accuse me of reaching then start spewing like that? More hypocrisy.
Facts…..the anti liberal
Private health care doesnt use oil?
I suspect, like most neo-cons, you simply miss the point…by saving our oil reserves NOW we can certainly expect to have enough oil for a longer period of time so that we can support this technology as we try and find alternatives. Dee dee dee…..
You’re reaching. So we should support creating wars to secure supply of an unsustainable product that WILL run out eventually, kill thousands of people (our own soldiers and people in the country we’ve invaded), because the medical industry needs petroleum?
Con logic = oxymoron.
To think like a liberal, you’ll have to remove 95% of your brain.
They have come a long way however, seeing how they evolved from rocks.
But you said the war wasn’t about oil.
Now you are saying it is.
I think you need to work on keeping track of your BS.
I mean, you called liberals idiots for saying the war was for oil. Now you are saying it was for oil. You kept saying the war was about freeing the people of Iraq so that they can be locked up and waterboarded, but not for oil, right?
Think that’s bad…how about the huge uproar cause by Bush’s proposal of drilling in Alaska. Obama said it and it passed without any fuss. They’re guppies in a tank who think partisan only.
LOL…. you are CLUELESS aren’t you?
You actually try to justify WAR for medical equipment?? Really?
This makes no sense. What does health care for everyone have to do with oil? I hope you had it at one time and just lost it, but statements like this make me think that it might never have been there…that would be your brain.
Most of our oil is used for fuel. We have more than enough oil in our own country for manufacturing needs. I believe we should develop renewable energy sources so we can save oil for manufacturing purposes and not need to invade foreign countries to get at their oil to burn for fuel.
I guess you could say our push for green technology is how we reconcile what you consider a hypocritical view.
“Since 90% of medical equipment and supplies are made from petroleum products”…even if that were true, Iraq is far from the only source for oil. It certainly wouldn’t justify invading a country and starting a prolonged war.
BTW, the Right claimed the war wasn’t about oil, remember?
It’s all about control that some don’t understand and will never believe. Take away deprive make weak then they have to have the Gov support and control them.Oil we have that will not see but the change U wanted is here.
You are really stretching it to connect totally unrelated issues here. Reducing dependency on fossil fuels for transportation and energy production has nothing to do with the production of Medical Equipment or the National Health Care.